 | Kingswear Castle has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 23, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kingswear Castle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! |  |
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kingswear Castle/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 13:43, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Never heard of this one, so I may as well find out now... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:43, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Toolbox checks -- no dab or EL issues.
Prose/structure -- my usual copyedit but no further concerns unless you feel I broke something.
Detail -- succinct, but I think reasonable for GA-level.
Referencing -- nothing leapt out re. reliability or formatting.
Images -- licensing checks out; my only suggestion is that it seems a shame to render these nice pics at the default size, I'd have thought the infobox photo (and map) could easily be say 280px, and the 1880 pic could get away with an upright factor of 1.2 or 1.3; just a thought...