 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 12:50, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Kim Ji-min (disambiguation) → Kim Ji-min — Need to move properly. Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 10:51, 8 July 2014 (UTC) Kanghuitari (talk) 04:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Note This talk is about the issue whether the comedian Kim Ji-min is primary or not. Sawol (talk) 05:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- NOTE the nominator moved Kim Ji-min (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) to Kim Ji-min (comedian) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) just before this nomination, so this is in effect a multimove. -- 65.94.171.126 (talk) 05:13, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Why comedian primary? There are many people with the name Kim Ji-min. We can not say she is the most famous among same name person. Korean Wikipedia is also not primary article. Kanghuitari (talk) 07:41, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose: The comedian Kim Ji-min is primary per searching Kim Ji-min -wikipedia at Google, and 김지민 at Bing. I know that ko.wikipedia does not accept WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for persons. Sawol (talk) 13:20, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- comedian kim ji-min in Google (393,000) / kim ji min gag concert (92,700), actress kim ji-min in Google (547,000) / kim ji min jyp (1,330,000) Comedian Kim Ji-min does not have much prominent among same name. of course, comedian Kim Ji-min is famous, but a lot of the same name in South Korea. Kanghuitari (talk) 05:02, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support. While the article for the comedian is most viewed, the article for the actress is also viewed by many. I don't think 4 to 3 ratio is enough to qualify WP:PRIMARYTOPIC usage criteria. --Kusunose 07:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support, lack of a clear overwhelming primary topic. bd2412 T 12:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.