Talk:Kazuya Kamenashi

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Fair use rationale for Image:Leather kame.jpg edit

 

Image:Leather kame.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:31, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Personality Section Dispute edit

I suggest just cutting it out. It's something very subject to personal interpretation and bias will creep in (from both fans and non-fans) despite best intentions. The vast majority of Johnny's Entertainment members don't have such a section anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiora the dragon (talkcontribs) 08:22, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


I agree with this. There is no such thing as fact when it comes to personality, but tons of bias when it comes to evaluating it. And also to be fair to all JE pages that do not have a personality section, the section should be removed. You-tachi (talk) 10:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)you-tachiReply


As I have messaged Fiora the dragon, i understand both of your concerns and will not continuing insisting on adding that section. However, I feel that it is important to provide information regarding how the other KAT-TUN members regard Kamenashi, which was what I tried to do but probably worded insufficiently such that others felt it was my own view towards his personality. Anyways, thanks for being so diligent! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amwong (talkcontribs) 10:47, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Triva edit

The fight between Kamenashi Kazuya and Ueda Tatsuya was happened in 2001 - SHOCK Musical, not in any KAT-TUN's concert (See Okyakusama wa Kamisama - Concert 55man nin Ai no request ni Kotaete DVD Concert for more info). And this trivia info does not needed add to bring wrongly impression about the relationship between Kamenashi and Ueda. In fact, they had a better relationship after the fight. So if anyone want to add this trivia info about that fight, you should add the recently info about this relationship as well. My english is not good but I hope you can understand my mean. Mixmin199 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 20:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree with this above statement. however, can I add that the trivia section be minimised? there is like a number of unneccesary ones that makes the page seem somewhat messy. --Alsykt (talk) 06:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC) alsyktReply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kazuya Kamenashi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kazuya Kamenashi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply