Talk:Katsucon

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Potential references edit

  • Lillard, Kevin (2006). "Con Report: Katsucon". Newtype USA. 5 (4): 95. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Editing the KatsuCon page by KatsuCon members... edit

I wanted to add to this page but after the Microsoft debacle, I was unsure on how to proceed. Yes, I work for KatsuCon but since I don't get paid for what I do, would that be wrong? I am a department head for Loss Prevention and I generally wanted to add to the content by adding some of the history. We are at number 14 this year. I was going to write an unbiased article, not a fluff piece. I respect Wikipedia's policy where permissions are concerned and I talked it over with KatsuCon Entertainment chairpersons. They're fine with me writing and have even given me contact infornmation for people who were there at the beginning but no longer are involved. I would not be getting paid by anyone. I just saw this article was a stub and since I knew some information, I wanted to contribute.
Kelcifeeney 20:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

It would still be a WP:COI if you add or make any major changes. However, if you can provide reliable sources, as I did above, it can help other editors write a better article. As for writing a more extensive history section, the problem with that is that unless it is verifiable through reliable sources, it would be considered original research. In short, we can publish Katsucon's history unless someone else has published Katsucon's history first or base it on the few reliable sources that do exist. --Farix (Talk) 00:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:46, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Katsucon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Katsucon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:32, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply