Talk:Karnal Sher Khan

Image copyright problem with Image:Captain Karnal Sher Khan.jpg

The image Image:Captain Karnal Sher Khan.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

File:Captain Karnal Sher Khan.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Captain Karnal Sher Khan.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:51, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://swabianpeople.webs.com/apps/blog/show/4760279. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 20:26, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

This article doesnt seem to reflect a proper professional, objective view, and needs to be thoroughly edited and re-written. Its rather too slanted in a fan-style article. Thanks. 39.54.123.131 (talk) 11:27, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Col (r) Mumtaz Khan, Pakistan

Indians vandalised this page. Indian biased editors stripped it off of all the details.

Hi I want to direct your attention to the fact that the wiki pages about India and Pakistan are gorging with Indian narratives and propaganda. When I tried to edit them to make them impartial, the pages get locked because of the suspicion of vandalism(at that time I didn't have wiki account). I think there are scores of Indian editors here and just like world's opinion they shape wikipedia narrative. For example, the page about col sher Khan shaheed had been stripped off of all the details from Indian bullies and it has nothing left. When I tried to put in the information that India suggested this person to be awarded Pakistans highest military award with a citation from Indian sources, it then became vandalism. While theirs highest military award holders have very elaborate and descriptive and uselessly biased tales and what not. Kindly try to correct those pages and make them impartial. Wikipedia is not their goverment run corporation or their media enterprise. Fyslrhmn (talk) 09:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

@Fyslrhmn: Here is a link to the article's edit history. Where in the article's edit history did you submit the changes you're detailing above? If you can provide a "diff" (hint: click on the relevant "PREV" link and copy/paste the URL), I'll look into it and try to figure out what the objection was to your edit. However, be advised, that you're not going to get anywhere if you're assuming bad faith of other Wikipedia editors or calling them names like "bullies" or vandals without evidence. This is a community editing project, so you need to both assume good faith as well as avoid personal attacks. It's certainly possible that you submitted a change that another editor rejected because the source was insufficient per Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines or something. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:11, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2020

His dead body was arranged to be sent by Brig M.P.S. Bajwa ( Retired) of Indian Army to New Delhi. With his Superior Officer's permission, Brig Bajwa placed a citation in Karnal Sher Khan's pocket. His body was offered to Pakistani High Commission in New Delhi to claim, but Pakistan Govt refused to claim the body stating that their Armed Forces were not involved in Kargil War. Ultimately, after mounting pressure from media and masses, his bosy was claimed by Pakistan Govt and was flown to Pakistan. He was honoured with Nishan e Haider posthomously later on

References

https://theprint.in/defence/how-an-indian-officer-helped-an-enemy-captain-win-pakistans-highest-gallantry-award/266973/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tU9UjjcOETI

https://defencelover.in/pakistani-army-awarded-colonel-due-indian-armys-appreciation/ Rajneesh Sood (talk) 18:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

 Not done. It's not clear what changes you want to make. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 18:35, 25 January 2020 (UTC)