Talk:Kappa Gamma Psi

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Copyvio edit

Regarding the copyvio notice, which had been added without any discussion here of what was problematic about the article, it appears that an editor may have added material in the same wording as the fraternity's official website later, but the original version of the article had no copyvio material. The article has been restored to its original version, obviating any necessity for further scrutiny. Thanks for your interest in this article. Badagnani (talk) 21:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Folding edit

Iota chapter folded this year, changed article accordingly. Mister Senseless (Speak - Contributions) 22:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fine, if properly sourced. Badagnani (talk) 22:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Their website hasn't been taken down or updated yet, and it may not be (it hasn't been updated in almost a year). I'm not sure who maintains the national website. Mister Senseless (Speak - Contributions) 22:36, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Title IX edit

This fraternity did not become coeducational because of Title IX. There is no source for that, and a vast number of other fraternities and sororities subject to the same laws remain all-male or all-female to this day. I'm removing that clause from the article. Weepingspider (talk) 06:56, 16 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kappa Gamma Psi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply