Talk:Kaiyuan Za Bao

Untitled

It really a shy! there is no corresponding Chinese version on this article! 210.245.203.185 (talk) 04:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Merger proposal

I suggest merging content from Peking Gazette to this page. One confusion - this page says this publication existed only from 713 to 734 (and the source for that information is in Chinese, which i cannot, alas, read), while the Peking Gazette page says it continued until 1912. Help? --John_Abbe (talk) 17:18, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Contradictory and hyperbolic claims

The material is deleted because it is contradictory nonsense and the sources of piss-poor quality, to be frank, referring only vaguely in passing to the publication. Magazine, newspaper and gazette are three different categories of 'print' media mutually exclusive. In addition, hyperbolic categorical claims like "the world's first" need much more backing up by sources than it is done now. One swallow does not make a summer. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 23:11, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kaiyuan Za Bao. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929121648/http://www.new-365.com/press_com/print/07_3.htm to http://www.new-365.com/press_com/print/07_3.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)