Talk:K. M. Joseph

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Vis14620 in topic Controversy section

Why this page is not locked to prevent vandalism?

edit

As this page was edited anonymously but Arunkum41466 did a tremendous job of reverting it back asap. The Edit if there may be in the light of the facts; should be under a new section "controversy". Arunkum41466 kindly do the honours if you may. Vis14620 (talk) 19:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Vis14620: There’s been more vandalism after that. I reverted all that as well and requested protection at RFPP. Yoshi24517 (mobile) (talk) 20:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Good work, but I don't think it will stop untill either this page be protected or the incident be documented in this page. I vote for the truth. Just add a controversy section, list the incident and be done with it. I've checked from different sources and the incident did happen. But I don't know how to edit Wikipedia so it won't get deleted. Yoshi24517 can you do it?? Vis14620 (talk) 05:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Do add the smiling judge part in the controversy column. It is pivotal as a Judgement of the man's character 122.175.182.21 (talk) 07:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
It's better if done by moderator level editors. What's important is; to see if they will or not. Vis14620 (talk) 08:52, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Controversy section

edit

There should be a controversy section in this article as various controversies did happen with the particular person. There are also various legitimate sources to back this. I also vote for a "CONTROVERSIES" section as @Vis14620. SatyaAmarRahe (talk) 08:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please specify what exactly you want to add along with reliable sources. @Vis14620 Mixmon (talk) 11:56, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
please note that this person is not a celebrity but a member of judiciary and language must confirm to the honourable status of Indian judiciary at all costs. And most of the leading news outlets are avoiding these controversies for obvious reasons.
There are sources but I'm not sure if all those sources qualify as reliable as Wikipedia have some source bias of it's own. No offense, but that's proven multiple times.
https://www.indiatoday.in/law/story/centre-agreed-to-appoint-justice-km-joseph-to-sc-after-cji-dipak-misra-threatened-to-resign-ranjan-gogoi-1885718-2021-12-08
https://www.newsbharati.com/Encyc/2023/3/30/Justice-Joseph-allegedly-smiles-at-SG-s-reference-to-brahmin-genocide.html
https://www.legallyindia.com/convos/topic/253036-wiki-page-locked-rw-publications-like-opindia-and-commune-claim-justice-joseph-smiled-at-claims-of-brahmin-genocide-could-contempt-be-filed
I hope these news articles are enough to create Controversy section, after all the hardwork of our fellow editors to keep this wiki page free from vandalism; they deserve this much recognition. And mind it, no offensive language should be used for any member of judiciary and if possible don't mention there was an offensive hashtag trending in Twitter after this alleged incident of smiling on genocide call of Hindu Brahmin community . Vis14620 (talk) 02:43, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
https://www.verdictum.in/news/supreme-court-justice-km-joseph-hate-speech-against-brahmins-1469539 Vis14620 (talk) 02:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
don't know if you checked but I've already added the info Mixmon (talk) 14:43, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've expunged the hate speech section you added in the BLP as overblown. The sources cited were either routine coverage of court proceedings or right wing trolling websites that apparently took umbrage at the exchange and weaved a narrative around it for consumption of their ecochamber but which is of no consequence to Wikipedia. If and when reliable sources critique it, we can revisit this. MBlaze Lightning (talk) 09:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay, I added it because of edit warring and talk page rquests and I have mentioned in the edit summary that I've not verified the sources. Mixmon (talk) 09:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
No worries. Have a good day. MBlaze Lightning (talk) 09:19, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Great work. Just a question, recorded court proceedings are not reliable? Vis14620 (talk) 10:31, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply