Talk:Juliusz Paetz

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Sexual abuse allegations edit

This article previously contained a significant amount of content on allegations of sexual abuse made against Archbishop Paetz. This content was removed, rightly, as it was unsourced and so violated Wikipedia's WP:BLP policy. However, the basic facts of the case - that he was accused of abuse, and resigned - seem to be well-sourced and undisputed. I've added a section on this, lifted from the article Pope John Paul II. The sources are mostly in Polish, which I don't read, but having run them through Google Translate they appear reliable enough for our purposes. Robofish (talk) 13:49, 14 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Juliusz Paetz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply