Talk:Juan Gómez-Quiñones

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Mexican-Americans Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Mexican-Americans task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Deleted criticism section edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The content may have some legitimacy. Here is a reliable source:

http://articles.latimes.com/1991-01-09/local/me-7191_1_chicano-studies/2

Brangifer (talk) 23:33, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I removed it due to the sourcing situation in the article. With a reliable source, we will have to consider whether this is important enough for inclusion; and if so, present it in a neutral manner, including Gomez-Quinones's view of the situation. Based on the one source you provided, I can't immediately see that this is something that should be included, but I don't have any definitive position, as I don't know the wider story and context. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 23:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I agree on all points. I have no particular burden about this matter, but people who make legal threats over actual events documented in RS not only irk me, their threats should be shown to be ineffectual and counterproductive. The Streisand effect can be pretty powerful! Wikipedia will not be threatened into silence or self-censorship. -- Brangifer (talk) 03:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic