Talk:Joseph Adams (mercenary)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Joseph Adams (mercenary) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sources unverified
Untitled edit
This guy might be in charge of some of the staff involved in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/United States Congress; certainly, some of the IPs were registered in his name. Johnleemk | Talk 11:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
POV tag edit
This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 21:24, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Explanayion needed edit
The first paragraph seems a bit odd to me. His acting as a mercenary for the Contras was ok, but his having done so on behalf of a US agency (the CIA) caused him to be tried and found (slightly) guilty in a US court? I think further explanation is needed. Maproom (talk) 21:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
No evidence edit
There is no credible evidence of this person's work as a mercenary. The entire history is without any verifiable source. 23.84.234.97 (talk) 21:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)