Talk:Jorja Fox

External links

I've re-added the link to Jorja Fox: Online. I re-read the external link policy and I believe the URL fits under 'Maybe OK to add', entry 3.

"Fan sites: On articles about topics with many fansites, including a link to one major fansite is appropriate, marking the link as such. In extreme cases, a link to a web directory of fansites can replace this link. (Note: fanlistings are generally not informative and should not ordinarily be included.)"

The site isn't a fanlisting, it has a repository of news articles and fairly npov viewpoints (as much as a fansite can, seeing as it's generally 'pro' actor ;) ). I would also argue that it's a major fan-site, and comes up #1 on most search engine hunts for Jorja Fox. -- Ipstenu 15:30, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

The link to Heather Reid is incorrect. Heather Reid of BBC/Scotland is not the same Heather Reid (a/k/a/ Heather Grody) that is part of Honeypot Productions. The IMBD lists three "Heather Reids" and you can find the correct one easily.

Restored fan link - I can't fathom why you would remove one and not the fanlisting. Didn't make any sense. Links to be considered may apply (see item #4). 99.147.193.229 (talk) 20:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Name spelling

Is it supposed to be Jorja-An with one "n" or is that a typo? 23skidoo 21:56, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

imdb has it as Jorja-An. She has also been credited as Jorjan. User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:02, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Her birth name is Jorja-An. Jorjan was a bastardization some TV show (Missing Persons?) came up with. -- Ipstenu 18:19, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

March issue of Calendar / LA Times?

The only March article I can find is this [1] and it doesn't mention a relationship at all. Can you cite your source? -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 22:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Diastema

I recently removed the reference to Fox having a diastema as I found this to be a non-defining characteristic. The information was restored by Ipstenu, with the edit summary, "it's not uncommon, but she's reffered to as gap-toothed in a number of articles so it's notable about her, like Patrick Stewart is noted for being bald." The article on Patrick Stewart doesn't simply state that he is bald; it mentions his baldness within the context his having been voted "Sexiest Man on Television" by TV Guide in 1992, noting that this was unusual, "considering his age and his baldness." The reference to Fox's diastema in this article doesn't provide any context, so, unless it can be established that this feature is in some way notable, due to its history, its rarity, or its effect, I think it's an example of indiscriminate information. It might be worth mentioning Tim McIlrath has heterochromia, as this is sufficiently rare, but a gap between the top incisors is common enough that mentioning that a person has one would be like mentioning that they had brown hair, a hooked nose, or freckles. As for the fact that Jorja Fox has been been referred to as "gap-toothed" in published articles, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, so I think its writing should maintain a more formal tone than TV Guide or the entertainment section of The New York Post. Entertainment publications are obviously going to use descriptive adjectives to refer to celebrities, but that doesn't mean we should follow suit, even if we opt for technical descriptions like "diastema" over informal ones like "gap-toothed." The diastema information was first inserted into the article by User:Maddmattg, and, looking through some of his contribs (example 1 and example 2), I get the impression that it was added as a joke. -Severa (!!!) 12:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. Given that it comes up often enough when people talk about her (in the news etc and by herself) I figured it is something that's notable about her. However I don't care enough to make a big thing over it. -- Ipstenu (talk • contribs) 21:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Has Jorja made comments about the diastema? In that case, it might be worth incorporating these, as it would add context. Looking at Maddmattg's contribs, I saw that the first article he made unconstructive edits to was People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, so perhaps this article was targetted by him due to Jorja's association with that group. -Severa (!!!) 11:10, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

I know what you mean. Though sometimes in the noise, you actually get a bit of signal that is appropriate. Here's what I was able to dig up fast:

From a Stuff magazine article, 2002:

STUFF: What's the strangest thing you've ever gotten stuck in that gap between your front teeth?

JORJA: I'd have to say rocks. A couple of rocks, I was camping, it was dark, I was caught up in the moment and I got some rocks in my teeth.
STUFF: Rocks. Your face was in the dirt?

JORJA: Gently, but yes.

From In Style magaine 2002:

When I was young, I was very chubby and had buckteeth. I could fit a quarter between my two front teeth.

and People Magazine 2003

Ask Jorja Fox about the small gap between her front teeth, and she presses her lips together in mock sensitivity. Starting at 12, "I worse braces for three years," says Fox, part of the crack forensics team on CBS's CSI: Crime Scene Investigation. "Then my wisdom teeth were supposed to come in and push them together. That didn't work. By the time I was 20, I said forget it." Good thing. "That's her Alfred E. Neuman smile," says costar George Eads, "And I've never seen anyone wear it better."

Which were the first three that I could dig up. -- Ipstenu (talk • contribs) 14:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps the quotes about her childhood could be used to add a bit more personal context to the article. Thanks for taking the time to do this research. :-) -Severa (!!!) 13:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

God bless google search engines :) Hm.

Growing up in Florida, Jorja Fox was overweight, with a prominent gap between her teeth. Over the years she had a variety of strange items stuck between her two front teeth, including a quarter and some rocks. By her twenties, neither her wisdom teeth nor braces had appreciably helped, and Jorja said "forget it."

Then I suppose something about how she always felt the odd-man out, being brunette in a sea of blondes. -- Ipstenu (talk • contribs) 13:27, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

This would seem like a good way to integrate this information into the flow of the article. The only thing I would change would be to attribute Jorja's description to herself, as in, "Growing up in Florida, Jorja Fox described herself as...". -Severa (!!!) 18:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

References

left CSI

changed from leaving CSI to left CSI per yahoo news report. Member - Society of Dog Lovers 23:38, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Two weeks ago Jorja said "no comment" to whether she was leaving or not. This week other reporters asked and again "no comment", now she suddenyl gave an interview to EW.com? Yahoo is quoting EW so it's really one source you've got there. Until CBS or Jorja make an official statement or Sara Sidle leaves Las Vegas, it's just gossip.Yamanbaiia 23:47, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Take a look at the EW.com story: it makes it clear that they had a discussion with Jorja herself on the topic. This is the money quote from the article:

"There are all these things I want to do. Some are personal. Some are professional. And I really need to do some of them before I get too old," explains Fox. "If I thought the show were on its last legs, I would have tried harder to stay the course. But I feel like its going to be around for a while, so if I don’t want some of those dreams to pass me by. I have to get off the ride for a while."

Seems clear enough to me. And the statement has since been picked up by the mainstream media via an article in the Associated Press. For us not to reference it would be a disservice. If it's untrue, we can correct it at that point. Tabercil 02:19, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

I guess that now so many sources (AOLnews too) have also posted EW.com interview it should be posted. But you are not so certain either, if not that would have been posted in the "career" section and not in "controversies".Yamanbaiia 21:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

And the EW website now has a full interview with Jorja on the topic, which can be read here. Tabercil 23:30, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

CNN announced it too. I guess this will soon be in "career". Yamanbaiia 23:39, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Speech melody

Does anyone have anything on her weird speech? At first I was put off by exactly this and I didn't want to watch any CSI, but now I follow it regularly. She seems to make unusual breaks in her sentences with the voice going high or low. I find this very weird, but I have to keep watching/listening. It's like not being able to look away from a car accident.Iago4096 20:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I've heard that she took up smoking, leading to her once 'high-pitched' voice becoming more gravely, I guess, but that's just hearsay (from YouTube comments anyway :P ). Haven't got any further info about that. Londonsista (talk) 02:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Nom

I NEVER nominated this for deletion. Removing that comment since it's just not true. Dude, I wasn't even ON Wikipedia then, I was on a break. Didn't come back till Novemberish and left again shortly thereafter. -- Ipstenu (talk • contribs) 16:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jorja Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070616174312/http://community.tvguide.com/blog/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Ausiello-Report/700000049 to http://community.tvguide.com/blog/TVGuide-Editors-Blog/Ausiello-Report/700000049

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jorja Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071016100922/http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2007/10/jorja-fox-makes.html to http://hollywoodinsider.ew.com/2007/10/jorja-fox-makes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:01, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jorja Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://theedge.bostonherald.com/tvNews/view.bg?articleid=197461
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070504014230/http://www.nypost.com/seven/05022007/tv/jorjas_rules_tv_michael_starr.htm to http://www.nypost.com/seven/05022007/tv/jorjas_rules_tv_michael_starr.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080528045333/http://tvguide.sympatico.msn.ca/TVNews/Articles/080523_casting_411_DW to http://tvguide.sympatico.msn.ca/TVNews/Articles/080523_casting_411_DW
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091016171234/http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/10/14/exclusive-jorja-fox-makes-her-csi-return-more-permanent/ to http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2009/10/14/exclusive-jorja-fox-makes-her-csi-return-more-permanent/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:53, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jorja Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071118160113/http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,271%7C89520%7C1%7C,00.html to http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1%2C1002%2C271%7C89520%7C1%7C%2C00.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071012235736/http://www.dollarforsense.com/ to http://www.dollarforsense.com/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://tvfilter.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!DB9D137CC0F754C9!22137.entry

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:36, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Activism Recognition?

With regard to the statement: "She is annually nominated for PETA's "World's Sexiest Vegetarian".[volume & issue needed]"

Doesn't this phrasing suggest that nomination will continue indefinitely? Since it's an annual rather than lifetime honor, I suggest a rephrase or removal. Gprobins (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)