Talk:John Murray of Broughton
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Murray of Broughton article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Untitled edit
I really hate it when people who know nothing about the subject stick these things on. There is little further information about this subject available. There are, to my knowledge, no extand pictures of this individual. No, it does not need an info box, no article NEEDS an info box.
Rather than saying 'this is a start' please make constructive suggestions and to what developements you suggest. If you can't be bothered, or don't know, then just leave alone.--Docg 10:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Act of Indemnity link edit
It would be better, naturally, if this linked to an actual article on Act of Indemnity 1747 - but that article doesn't currently exist, and someone may or may not create it. For now, it is better if the reader can find out what an Act of Indemnity is, by linking to the general article.--Scott Mac 15:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Article classification edit
This must be B class / Good article level by now surely? Svejk74 (talk) 11:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)