Talk:John Langdon Down

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

John Langdon Down is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2020 and 27 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ikeshammah.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

[Untitled] edit

This Page Needs To Be Wikified, It does not Adhere to Wiki Format.

Proposed merge edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

We seem to have one man with two articles Saga City (talk) 17:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have recommended the other article for deletion and formated this article. Jeremiah (talk·cont) 17:40, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Location? edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wasn't his hometown Teddington? If I'm wrong, it's my own error. --CrabFreak (talk) 12:32, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Why is there no mention of the racist classifications of this Doctor Downs" edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

https://books.google.com/books?id=RTjfmxTpsVsC&pg=PA165&lpg=PA165&dq=stephen+jay+gould+down%27s+syndrome&source=bl&ots=5eeIdDP2tq&sig=NGgWLFdXpT8mH4Ep_8-y0J_DRzM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=fT0LVZagLYzdoATZz4DACQ&ved=0CCUQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=stephen%20jay%20gould%20down's%20syndrome&f=false — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8:B380:5C5:C04B:35BF:ACF9:E346 (talk) 21:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Er, there is? Right there on the page. 46.16.1.254 (talk) 09:45, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

This man invented downs syndrome???? edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

WHY IS THERE NOT MENTION OF HIM CRITICISM! DOWNS SYNDRME IS TERRIBLE ILLNESS AND THIS MAN INVENTED IT??? WHY IS THIS NOT CRITICIZED IN ARTICLE??

Normally I would be very hesitant to remove something from the talk page but this kind of idiotic post - maybe meant in jest by someone with a very weird sense of humour?? - simply begs for deletion. Thoughts? Cross Reference (talk) 15:55, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic