Managing Editor title

edit

It should probably be noted that Ms. Abramson is managing editor for news, while John Geddes is managing editor for production, unless I have misrembered the announcement from months ago. AndreasKQ 13:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 15:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

New role at NYT: Executive Editor

edit

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/03/business/media/03paper.html?_r=3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.222.23.2 (talk) 14:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Firing by NYTimes/Sulzberger

edit

Someone keeps reverting edits referencing the well-sourced and extensively documented May 14, 2014 firing of Ms. Abramson from her position as Executive Editor of the New York Times and, citing an Al Jazeera report of all things, changing the wording to "stepped down." This is sheer nonsense. She did not "step down," she was unequivocally fired — dismissed if it makes you feel better, but there was nothing voluntary about it as the New York Times' own reporting shows: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/20/business/media/after-firing-from-times-jill-abramson-talks-about-resilience.html I can't imagine what's behind this ludicrous attempt at diluting the facts. Chivalry?Gillartsny (talk) 21:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Howard Kurtz of Fox did a good article on this, most of which confirmed in bits and pieces of other sources I read the other day. Check it out. At my leisure was going to beef up the paragraph and/or section, should it warrant one. Also waiting to see if she'll have a statement - or lawsuit - to quote. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 19:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
Speculation about a lawsuit violates BLP and should be removed. SPECIFICO talk 00:49, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jill Abramson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:36, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply