This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@David Eppstein: I agree that the lead should be written for a general audience and non-technical. Regarding this edit, it's not pedantic that the wording needs to be revised away from solved the "cursed curve", a Diophantine equation. A curve can be the solution set of an equation, but not be an equation. One can solve a Diophantine equation (which might define a curve), but one cannot solve a curve. There are ways to word this non-technically while still making sense.
Perhaps we don't need to explicitly mention rational points but I don't think that adding something like "rational solution" or "rational point" really introduces much extra technicality for general audiences compared to the extra precision. — MarkH21talk 18:22, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
The place for technicality is not the lead sentence. If you really want to be pedantic that a curve is not something that can be solved, then "solved the problem of the cursed curve". —David Eppstein (talk) 19:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
That's at an improvement, and I think it's suitable. I agree that we should avoid technical language to the lead sentence, but it should at least be somewhat correct. — MarkH21talk 20:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
The Wikipedia article says she is "Clare Boothe Luce Assistant Professor", Google Scholar and her homepage at Boston University say she is "Clare Boothe Luce Associate Professor". Her CV (http://math.bu.edu/people/jbala/JSB_CV.pdf) says this was a step in her career in this year 2021. I intend to change that in the Wikipedia article. --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 13:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hope i did not make an edit accident with the citation templates.--Himbeerbläuling (talk) 13:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
