User:MarkH21
     
User talk:MarkH21
     
User:MarkH21/toolbox
     
Special:Contributions/MarkH21
Main
     
Talk
     
Toolbox
     
Contributions

East TurkestanEdit

Dear MarkH21,

I saw your changes in the Wikipedia page East Turkestan. I see that you wrote about the region East Turkestan, and not about the Uyghur East Turkestan, where the page is actually intended for. I refer you to the page Xinjiang if you want to help with this region. I do also find that you write with a Chinese point of view, so please write with a neutral point of view.

Frendly greetings and I hope you had a good New Year! Roxanne — Preceding unsigned comment added by ROXANNE9090 (talkcontribs) 14:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

The article has always been about the term and region. Even the current article prose reflects that. You are attempting to change the scope of the article to match another article, East Turkistan Government-in-Exile, against established consensus at East Turkestan.
I am not editing the article with any POV; I am telling you to stop edit warring against multiple editors and to use the talk page.
Happy New Year. — MarkH21talk 14:59, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit warEdit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war about East Turkestan; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. --ROXANNE9090 (talk) 14:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

You have been reverting multiple editors and editing against an established consensus from a previous discussion on the talk page. Stop reverting and use the talk page. — MarkH21talk 14:56, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Taiwan has an RFCEdit

 

Taiwan has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. STSC (talk) 02:14, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Sherdog.com RfC Closure Has Had No Effect on Wikipedia Because of a Small but Organized Gang of EditorsEdit

Hi. You had participated in the 30-day RfC of Sherdog.com's reliability at RSN here Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_318#Sherdog.com and in the end it was closed to be used only for some basic fight information in the absence of reliable sources such as ESPN, on a case by case basis and with that fact that additional considerations apply on top of it (option 2 or 3).

But some editors (NEDOCHAN, Cassiopeia, Squared.Circle.Boxing, and a couple more) who voted for the reliability of Sherdog.com in the RfC, still enforce the usage of Sherdog.com as the most trusted source on MMA-related pages and go edit-wars for it. They are like a small organized gang of editors that have taken anyting MMA-related hostage on the Wikipedia and act like owners of the whole site. It would be nice if you could help with the enforcement of the result and consensus that were reached there since you helped reaching the consensus in the RfC. Thanks in advance.78.190.164.254 (talk) 15:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

They are especially active on pages Conor_McGregor, Tony Ferguson and Dan Henderson, trying to enforce the usage of Sherdog.com as the source over reliable sources such as ESPN, Fox, UFC.78.190.164.254 (talk) 16:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Merge of Black Caribs into GarifunaEdit

Hi! I have seen that you have recently merged the Black Carib article with the Garifuna article. The discussion on whether the black Carib article should be removed and become a redirection of the "Garifuna" article was never finished and no conclusion was ever reached. The Black Carib article referred to the Black Caribs of the island of St. Vincent, not the Garifuna of Central America.--Isinbill (talk) 14:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

@Isinbill: Thanks for the message and for bringing this to my attention! I have to admit that when I looked at the articles before carrying out the merge, I only looked at Talk:Black Caribs and I did not see the discussion at Talk:Garifuna#Proposed merge of Black Caribs into Garifuna, which was a complete mistake on my part. I thought that it was an undiscussed and uncontested merge proposal that was lingering for almost a year. I'll undo my merge at Black Caribs.
If Garifuna specifically refers to the descendents of the Black Caribs outside of St. Vincent, then that should probably be made clear in the article (rather than just formerly known as Black Caribs). I've left a comment at the merge discussion. — MarkH21talk 14:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
You are right. I renamed the article to "Black Caribs (St. Vincent)".--Isinbill (talk) 16:27, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Original Barnstar
Thank you for improving Oka–Weil theorem ! SilverMatsu (talk) 06:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you!Edit

Hello! Thank you for alerting me that the IP self-reverted their changes! SoyokoAnis 13:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)