Talk:Jayne Mansfield

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Moriori in topic Nude photo from “Promises, Promises”.
Good articleJayne Mansfield has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 21, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
January 22, 2012Good article nomineeListed
May 16, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
August 24, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 29, 2010, June 29, 2013, June 29, 2017, and June 29, 2022.
Current status: Good article

An unexpected treasure trove edit

This one is amazing. Aditya(talkcontribs) 16:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

So is this one. Aditya(talkcontribs) 14:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
 
Ferrari anyone?
The 250 ML? Or the one bought by Matt Cimber? Maybe the pink Lincoln.
May be other boyfriends like Portofino Rubirosa or Gunter Sachs? 103.144.165.175 (talk) 09:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nude photo from “Promises, Promises”. edit

This pornographic photo is gratuitous and inappropriate, since users do not expect to see nudity when using Wikipedia. Whiterobes (talk) 14:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

The photo is hardly pornographic. Read our Pornography article. The opening sentence says "Pornography (often shortened to porn) is the portrayal of sexual subject matter for the exclusive purpose of sexual arousal. " How you think that photo is displayed "for the exclusive purpose of sexual arousal" is a mystery.

It also serves no purpose here.174.0.48.147 (talk) 00:44, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

That's your opinion, given without supporting evidence. When you removed the image you ignored the message which said "Present editorial consensus is that the photo is appropriate for and belongs in the article." Wikipedia works on consensus, not your personal taste. I'm not too fussed by the image, but have restored it per consensus. Moriori (talk) 01:13, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply