Talk:Japanese newspapers

Proposed changes

The title of this article somehow strikes me as awkward; isn’t there a better way to express it? Even more basically, why is there no Wikipedia article on “Japanese newspapers” per se?? There is a general article on “Newspapers,” with nothing about Japan, and a simple “List of Japanese newspapers” but nothing on Japanese newspapers per se. You should start such an article; one obvious place to start is the Japanese Wikipedia article on 新聞, plus articles in standard Japanese encyclopedias, Kokushi daijiten, etc. And why limit the dates to what is available at Columbia? This is very parochial, when a simple search on RLIN or OCLS will give you references to resources throughout the US. Also, the whole article should begin with an explanation of the ways in which newspapers have been reproduced, above all the shukusatsuban format, which should be clearly explained, and its history given (probably began with Asahi in early 20s). The whole article is too much like a list of what’s at Columbia: it should be a broader article on what is available anywhere. Throughout the article, the Romanization is inconsistent, sometimes “shinbun” sometimes “shimbun.” By the current Kenkyusha standard, all should be “shinbun.” But the “List of Japanese newspapers” article uses “m”. I think all should be changed to “n” but maybe this is going too far. Jb05-Hds2 00:29, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

The brief history also doesn't have any citations or explanation of what it means by "modern newspaper", when the some of the newspapers it cites were first published, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.125.1.182 (talk) 03:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Circulation

I came here trying to find out why all of the world's top five newspapers (by circulation) are Japanese; why, seemingly, a decent proportion of all newspapers published come from one country -- and not a country with an overwhelmingly huge population. Any ideas? 190.21.163.157 (talk) 04:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

In November of the same year

The Brief History is missing a date reference: In the first sentence of the second paragraph of this section there are no dates given yet the second sentence makes the date reference: "In November of the same year". However this appears to be incomplete as there is no year previously specified. Can someone with suitable knowledge please update this information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.115.145.188 (talk) 08:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Japanese newspapers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070814090820/http://www.pressnet.or.jp:80/data/01cirsekai.htm to http://www.pressnet.or.jp/data/01cirsekai.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:01, 14 January 2016 (UTC)