Talk:James McSweeney

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2603:8001:7E41:3B86:B43E:DA9D:FC2C:FA26 in topic Is

Untitled edit

Not sure if anyone noticed, but the only reference listed on his page besides Sherdog is the Fight Magazine article here:

http://news.fightmagazine.com/james-mcsweeney-1233/

So I'm confused where his WP listed kickboxing record came from when the Fight Magazine article specifically lists him as having a "136-9 combined record". Hexrei2 Does "combined record" include fights that shouldn't be counted in a Kickboxing record?(talk) 08:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Personally i think its an impossible record for that kinda caliber fighter. I think it should be deleted because its misleading.Marty Rockatansky (talk) 08:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I've repeatedly tried to source out an offical record of James's for Kickboxing and/or Muay Thai. The lack of video evidence is astonishing for a well recognised fighter. I believe the linked "source" is just another disputed reference; leading back to more disputed sourcing - leaving no actual record. Will Samuelson. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 20.138.246.79 (talk) 08:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James McSweeney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Is edit

It really this big? 2603:8001:7E41:3B86:B43E:DA9D:FC2C:FA26 (talk) 08:06, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Reply