Talk:Israeli bombing of the Gaza Strip
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Israeli bombing of the Gaza Strip article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| This page is not a forum for general discussion about Israeli bombing of the Gaza Strip. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Israeli bombing of the Gaza Strip at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 11:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- ... that Israel's bombing of Gaza has been compared to history's most destructive bombing campaigns, including the bombings of Dresden and Cologne? Source: Financial Times
- ALT1: ... that the Israeli military is using an artificial intelligence system dubbed "the Gospel" to select targets for its Bombing of Gaza? Source: The Guardian
- Reviewed: [[]]
Created by CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk). Self-nominated at 07:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bombing of Gaza; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Not met, per WP:DYKSPLIT - Other problems: -
Splits from non-new articles are ineligible, but if the copied text does not exceed one-fifth of the total prose size, the article can be considered eligible as a fivefold expansion of the copied text.
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral: - There is a lot of imprecise language: "Experts stated", "Experts warned", "Public health experts", unqualified uses of "large" etc. Needs a thorough copyedit.
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems: - Combined with the above imprecise language throughout, the article needs a thorough copy edit.
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Unfortunately, this article is currently ineligible for DYK as the majority of its content has been sourced from other Wikipedia articles, and as far as I can tell the 5x expansion requirement for this kind of DYK has not been met. My recommendation is to nominate the article at GA as this would mean the article would meet the third newness clause: promoted to good article status;
Seddon talk 22:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 26 September 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There needs to be clarification on the 70,000tons of bombs dropped in Gaza, the media currently is using this to falsely claim that 70,000 tons of bombs has been dropped since October 7 massacre, which is false. 70,000 tons may have been dropped in Gaza since the strip was vacated by Israel in 2005 but all sources say 20-25,000 tons of bombs have been dropped in Gaza since October 7. Please remedy this fallacy before it becomes accepted as fact. Clarity is paramount, preventing the spread of misinformation is as well. 71.17.181.34 (talk) 04:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- There are no sources in your request. Add one or more reliable sources if you want something to change. Sean.hoyland (talk) 07:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Charliehdb (talk) 10:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
No reliable sources for the 70000 tons bombing claim
editHaving recently heard about the claim that Israel used more than 70000 tons of bombs on Gaza since october 2023 I wanted to check the information and came to this wikipedia article, however there seem to be no reliable source for the claim as only a statement from Euromedmonitor (a NGO whose founder supported the 7 october attacks) without any supporting data. As the page is protected I cannot tag the sources as insufficient but I hope that an experienced user will be able to do so Sorontur (talk) 09:29, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
- I would also like this to be corrected. This 70000 tonnes claim has no reliable source to support it. Euromed says on their website that “it is estimated” but estimated by who exactly? They do not say. 46.254.249.30 (talk) 22:57, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Misleading Information: "The UN reports that 86% of the Gaza Strip is under Israeli evacuation orders"
editI followed the source, and found the actual statement reported by the UN which differs from the text in the page (the source linked was from a secondary Al Jazeera source). The actual UN source claims "In total, 314 square kilometres (86 per cent) of the Gaza Strip have come under evacuation orders since 7 October." I cannot edit since the page is extended-protected.
It's very different to say that 86% of Gaza is under evacuation compared to the true statement that 86% of Gaza have come under evacuation orders since 7 October. RyanCG123 (talk) 12:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 October 2024
edit| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- What I think should be changed:
| − | 15,797+ civilians | + | 15,797+ civilians |
- Why it should be changed:
The estimated breakdown is referenced to 1, but no such breakdown is given in that article.
- References supporting the possible change:
The article itself Guy Haddad 1 (talk) 10:49, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
Done The source included some statistics, but it was not complete data and was improperly extrapolated. Thank you for catching this! Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:41, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
References