John Gill is not a reliable source

edit

I removed a large portion of text copy-pasted from John Gill directly into the content of this article. John Gill is not a reliable source -- he's writing in the eighteenth century, for Pete's sake, well before modern biblical scholarship was in anything like its current form. Wikipedia articles shouldn't have most of their material simply copy-pasted in from a source like that. Alephb (talk) 04:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply