Talk:Iran–United States Claims Tribunal

wp:primary

According to wp:nor we should not use videos as the source in articles.

Other examples include archeological artifacts; photographs; historical documents such as diaries, census results, video or transcripts of surveillance, public hearings, trials, or interviews; tabulated results of surveys or questionnaires; original philosophical works; religious scripture; published notes of laboratory and field experiments or observations written by the person(s) who conducted or observed the experiments; and artistic and fictional works such as poems, scripts, screenplays, novels, motion pictures, videos, and television programs.

--Wayiran (talk) 22:55, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

worth adding?

The Iranian government reportedly has the names of all individuals who filed claims against Iran at the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal at The Hague pursuant to the 1981 Algerian Accords. In addition, the Iranian government reportedly has compiled a list of the claimants who were awarded compensation in the Iran Claims Program administered by the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission. The Iranian government has allegedly been targeting award-holders who travel to Iran. It has been reported that upon some claimants' entry into Iran, Iranian authorities have questioned them as to the status of payment of their respective awards with a view to recouping the award money. The Iranian government has also reportedly threatened to prevent U.S. claimants who visit Iran from departing the country until they make arrangements to repay part of or their entire award.

source:

http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1142.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.229.73.57 (talk) 21:29, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

English court decision

I took a look at the the Mellat Bank decision mentioned in the article and it seems to me that the Court comes to the opposite conclusion - it upheld the jurisdiction of the tribunal and held the new case to be an abuse of process. Anyone care to confirm? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.177.153.18 (talk) 10:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Adding cites and copy-editing

It seems that the article has been mostly written by a non-native English speaker. I've cleaned it up somewhat, but there are still some grammar, tone, citation, and bias issues that should be delt with. Gbabuch (talk) 03:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)