Talk:Interstate 180 (Nebraska)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Interstate 180 (Nebraska)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 16:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

I can take a look at this! — GhostRiver 16:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

• "and began construction" → "and construction began" - the subject of the sentence is "It", so current sentence setup makes it look like the highway constructed itself
  • Fixed.

Route description

• Good

History

• "local engineers union" → "local engineers' union"
  • Fixed.
• The word "temporarily" is used three times in two sentences in the paragraph beginning "The southern section from 9th Street"
  • Fixed.
• Missing letter: "1998. he project" → "1998. The project"
  • Fixed.
• "nesting cliff swallow" → "nesting cliff swallows", as the source says multiple birds were found
  • Fixed.
• It feels like there should be another sentence at the end to finish up this paragraph on the 2001-03 construction
  • Reordered to put the project elements last as a wrap-up, and expanded with another sentence on the bird issue.

Exit list

• Good

References

• Good

General comments

• Image is relevant and properly licensed
• No stability concerns present in the revision history
• No copyvio concerns

Just a few quick prose things, plus one area of expansion. Putting on hold for now; feel free to ping me with questions or comments. — GhostRiver 16:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

@GhostRiver: Thanks for the review. I believe I've addressed all of your concerns. SounderBruce 19:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Looks good now, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 19:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that reconstruction of Nebraska's Interstate 180 was disrupted by the discovery of nesting migratory birds? Source: Lincoln Journal Star (part 2)
  • ALT1:... that a bridge on Nebraska's Interstate 180 initially opened with oil drums in place of guardrails? Source: Lincoln Evening Journal
  • ALT2:... that reconstruction of Nebraska's Interstate 180 was timed around the Nebraska Cornhuskers football schedule? Source: The Daily Nebraskan

• Reviewed: New Amsterdam Theatre

Improved to Good Article status by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 00:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: - Not done
Overall: Interesting hook, well-written and -cited article. Should be good to go once QPQ completed. Ploni (talk) 02:03, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

• @Ploni: QPQ has been added. SounderBruce 06:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

• Ready for DYK! –Ploni (talk) 12:03, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Promoting the main hook to Prep 6 – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)