Talk:International reactions to the 2008 Tibetan unrest

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Pasdecomplot in topic Quote from Central Tibetan Administration
Former FLCInternational reactions to the 2008 Tibetan unrest is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 14, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 24, 2008Featured list candidateNot promoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 18, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that international reaction to 2008 Tibetan unrest has included police protecting the Chinese embassy in Reykjavík, Iceland, from a peaceful demonstration?
Current status: Former featured list candidate

Huaxia 's reasoning

edit

(copied from Talk:July 2009 Ürümqi riots where the same user was trying to pull the same fallacy)

Look at your own edit summary for your revert at International reaction to 2008 Tibetan unrest:

My question was
"Before you go and change every "pro-Tibet" to "Free Tibet", try to come up with a similar change to "pro-China"... what would that be?"
Your answer:
"Reverted POV bias. Pro-PRC would not work because Taiwanese and Overseas Chinese also protested. Pro-China is the only thing besides "pro-Chinese" I can think of; as opposed to "pro-Han" etc"

Now, if not all ethnic Chinese that protest are "pro-PRC", then how is that that every person on earth who protests for the rights of Tibetans or Uyghurs must be for a "Free Tibet" or "pro-Uyghur Independence"? You're willing to make a clear distinction between those who love the PRC on the one hand and those who don't but happen to be ethnic Chinese, but then go ahead and lump all Uyghurs, Tibetans, and the rest of the world into one pot. That doesn't fly. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 21:22, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on International reactions to 2008 Tibetan unrest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on International reactions to 2008 Tibetan unrest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Quote from Central Tibetan Administration

edit

The quotation seems to have the word "rioter" inserted in the text multiple times, in caps and in brackets. Original quotation would be better without editing, but since it's in Chinese, a reliable translation is necessary. It's presently unverifiable. Also, it's the only block quote on page. Needs addressing. Thanks. Pasdecomplot (talk) 22:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

DONE the text without "rioter" has been verified Pasdecomplot (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2021 (UTC)Reply