Talk:Intermodal freight transport
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): LTriolo. Peer reviewers: LTriolo.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Narrow gauge
editCurrently, double stacking operates on standard gauge and broad gauge tracks. Would there be any problems such as instablility is operating such trains on narrow gauge or metre gauge tracks? Would there be any reduction in speeds? Tabletop (talk) 04:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- load bourd —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.178.94.44 (talk) 18:49, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
- The center of gravuty won't allow double stacking on narrow gauge. Peter Horn User talk 13:18, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Malcolm McLean
editWhy is there nothing on Malcolm McLean and the Ideal-X? He was the father of standardized containerized shipping in the US and the Ideal-X was its first ship. Abe Froman (talk) 11:43, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
- There is an article on Malcolm McLean and for the SS Ideal X and details of these within Containerization. Feel free to add a short note to this article making reference to this which certainly be relevant. PeterEastern (talk) 13:08, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Containers and container handling
editdubious statement: "Containers are 8-foot (2.4 m) wide by 8-foot (2.4 m) high."
To my knowledge all ISO containers are either 8 foot 6 inches or 9 foot 6 inches high. Does anyone know of an 8 foot standard being used? As well the article mentions 8 foot 6 inches or 9 foot 6 inches in "moves to adopt other heights" where in fact these are the standard intermodal heights. Dougmcdonell (talk) 15:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Planes
editI'm misssing how this section has anything to do with intermodal, suggest deletion Dougmcdonell (talk) 18:14, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Intermodal freight transport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090327001747/http://www1.axsliner.com/WWW/research_files/EMMA_MAERSK_capa_estimate.pdf to http://www.axsliner.com/WWW/research_files/EMMA_MAERSK_capa_estimate.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Intermodal freight transport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130808120846/http://portofoakland.com/maritime/factsfig.asp to http://www.portofoakland.com/maritime/factsfig.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091009170721/http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/vehicles/guidelines_cargo_securing__en.htm to http://www.ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/vehicles/guidelines_cargo_securing__en.htm
- Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20121224203105/http%3A//www.eia%2Dngo.com/ to http://www.eia-ngo.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Intermodal
editWhat is intermodal 41.220.20.14 (talk) 19:55, 25 June 2022 (UTC)