 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 24 November 2016 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: MOVED —UY Scuti Talk 05:45, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
Taipei Metro CITYFLO650 → Bombardier INNOVIA APM 256 – CITYFLO 650 is a wrong name by mixing up the name of the control system and that of the rolling stock. Either Bombardier INNOVIA APM 256 or Taipei Metro C370 is better and without ambiguity. SElephant (talk) 08:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)--SElephant (talk) 08:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- I suggest moving this to Taipei Metro Bombardier Innovia APM 256 and set up O'Hare ATS Bombardier Innovia APM 256 Sinsyuan (talk) 12:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Width edit
Why does it say 2.54 when its name is from being 2.56 m wide? I put a Citation Needed tag in case it is 2.54 m wide in reality rather than change it to 2.56 m. QuarioQuario54321 (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)