Talk:Indigenous peoples of Maryland

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 16:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Created by AviationFreak (talk). Self-nominated at 03:28, 3 October 2020 (UTC).Reply


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:   - The hooks are alright and I will check them more thoroughly if you still want to choose one of them, but I'd be more interested by something less about Europeans, such as:
Feel free to improve this alt or counter-propose something.
QPQ: None required.

Overall:   It is important to note that Native American territorial boundaries were ... should just be Native American territorial boundaries were ... per WP:NOTED. — Bilorv (talk) 19:04, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • @Bilorv: Changed the working as per NOTED, and I'd be happy to add that hook - Do I just append it to the current template? AviationFreak💬 20:19, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
    Great, thanks for the quick fix. You don't need to do anything more –   ALT2 approved, and the admin who signs off on this will read this comment and know which hook to copy over. — Bilorv (talk) 20:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  •   @Bilorv: yours is a great hook, but per Rule H2, you cannot approve your own hook. Could another reviewer take a look at this please? Yoninah (talk) 14:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • @Yoninah: for future reference, can you explain what is different in this case to nominations like How to Be an Antiracist, Danielle Lessovitz and many others I've taken part in where the reviewer suggests a hook and the nominator agrees? Is the rule new? Or those previous nominations mistaken? — Bilorv (talk) 22:24, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • @Bilorv: If a new hook fact is introduced, someone else should review it. In the case of How to Be an Antiracist, all the reviewer did was rearrange the words in the nominator's hook. In Danielle Lessovitz, all you did was add the film title to the hook; it was already there in the piped link. But here you added Paleo-Indians and a year—these are new facts, so you should recuse yourself and call for a new reviewer per Rule H2. Yoninah (talk) 22:43, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • I don't think I've ever seen this done before but there we go. The fact is in the article and the relevant citations: DiLisio, James E.; Bready, James H. "Maryland History". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, inc. and "The First Marylanders". Visit Maryland.. I guess now we wait for another reviewer. — Bilorv (talk) 23:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Thanks. I'll move this back to WP:DYKN so it will get more eyes on it. Yoninah (talk) 23:10, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Review needed for ALT2. Yoninah (talk) 23:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Piscataway people should be on the map but they aren't edit

I have valid sources describing their territory. They have been well studied. I'll add it later.

Chesapeake77 (talk) 09:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Chesapeake77: I have added the Piscataway to the map at Commons as being within present-day Charles, Prince George's, and St. Mary's Counties. AviationFreak💬 18:42, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks!
Chesapeake77 (talk) 20:57, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply