Talk:Indian epic poetry

Merge from Hindu Epics to Indian epic poetry

These pages seem to serve the same purpose. "XXX epic poetry" seems to be the norm for other cultures, so I would suggest that it be the target of the merge. John (Jwy) 06:06, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Very nice. — goethean ॐ 15:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Proposed Merged Article

---

Indian epic poetry is the epic poetry written on the Indian sub-continent. Written in Sanskrit, Tamil and Hindi, it includes some of the oldest epic poetry ever created and some works form the basis of Hindu scripture.

Why are there never any articles or statements critical of the basic intellectual foundations or presuppositions of the individual articles or the encyclopedia itself. It seems that these type of comments are suppressed by the editors. Am I wrong? W. Liam Allan-Dalgleish W. Liam Allan-Dalgleish (talk) 21:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

@W. Liam Allan-Dalgleish Wikipedia is a kind of indexing of the significant information present in internet, books, publication etc. Critical statements or articles are a kind of original research which is prohibited on Wikipedia. Riteze (talk) 05:45, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Sanskrit Epics

The ancient Sanskrit epics, the Ramayana and Mahabharata, occasionally termed "Mahakavya" ("Great Compositions"), refer to epic poems that form a canon of Hindu scripture. Indeed, the epic form prevailed and verse was and remained until very recently the preferred form of Hindu literary works. Hero-worship was and is a central aspect of Indian culture, and thus readily lent itself to a literary tradition that abounded in epic poetry and literature. The Puranas, a massive collection of verse-form histories of India's many Hindu gods and goddesses, followed in this tradition.

At least from the Puranas we know that the earliest versions were composed in Prakrits, not Sanskrit. Since the great epics were a non-Brahminic form of literture, why not assume the were renered in Prakrit as well`? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.139.102.168 (talk) 17:54, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Tamil Epics

Main article: The Five Great Epics of Tamil Literature

The post-sangam period (2nd century-6th century) saw many great Tamil epics being written, including Cilappatikaram (or Silappadhikaram), Manimegalai, Jeevaga-chintamani, Valayapati and Kundalakesi. Later, during the Chola period, Kamban (12th century) wrote what is considered one of the greatest Tamil epics — the Kamba ramayanam of Kamban, based on the Ramayana.

Hindi Epics

The first epic to appear in Hindi was Tulsidas' (1543-1623) Ramacharitamanasa, also based on the Ramayana. It is considered a great classic of Hindi epic poetry and literature, and shows the author Tulsidas in complete command over all the important styles of composition — narrative, epic, lyrical and dialectic. He has given a human character to Rama, the Hindu avatar of Vishnu, potraying him as an ideal son, husband, brother and king.

Objection to use with hindu scripture

I've removed the following from the article. It would need to be cited and is probably inappropriate for the lead. I will ask for help from the Hinduism project.

The labelling of Hindu sacred texts as "epics" is regarded as discriminatory and offensive by Hindus because the religious texts are sacred texts before being anything else, and should be referred to as such rather than using the technical classification "epic".

Thanks. (John User:Jwy talk) 14:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Good call! Abecedare (talk) 14:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Some Hindus have objected to the use of the word Mythology also. They believe that everything is history. I think what you did was correct.--Sankarrukku (talk) 06:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Indian epic poetry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928065505/http://www.pustakshakti.com/siribhoovalaya_news_item_-_17.htm to http://www.pustakshakti.com/siribhoovalaya_news_item_-_17.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928065432/http://www.pustakshakti.com/siribhoovalaya_news_item_-_6.htm to http://www.pustakshakti.com/siribhoovalaya_news_item_-_6.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:44, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Trimming of large sections.

Some content of the sections Kannada epics and Meitei epics should be moved to the main article as mentioned therein, for trimming the sections. Riteze (talk) 06:11, 19 October 2024 (UTC)