Talk:Il Mare Calmo della Sera

Latest comment: 2 days ago by IvanScrooge98 in topic Requested move 27 May 2024

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Il Mare Calmo della Sera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 27 May 2024 edit

Il Mare Calmo della SeraIl mare calmo della sera – Italian-language style per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization)#Works and compositions, in line with Il mare calmo della sera (song). I had opened a technical request which was contested by User:Amakuru, who also reverted a subsequent move perfomed by User:Liz. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 22:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@IvanScrooge98: How about addressing the issues that I raised at the RM/TR regarding common name and usage rather than this suggestion that I've done something wrong. WP:RMUM is clear that moves may be reverted if they're contested so your focus on me is absurd. I'm open to being persuaded that the proposed title is the correct one but you haven't demonstrated in this nomination that it's commonly used in English sources. Cheers  — Amakuru (talk) 22:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have addressed those in the link above. The naming conventions for non-English titles seem to point to the style used in the original rather than English sources. In any case, I’m sorry if this felt like an attack because those weren’t my intentions—I just thought it would be fair to mention you lest this seemed like an attempt at ignoring the previous conversation. Regards. ~ IvanScrooge98 (talk) 23:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply