Talk:Hyundai

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Zxcvbnm in topic Requested move 13 October 2023

Requested move 23 September 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Unanimously opposed. (closed by non-admin page mover)MaterialWorks 11:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)Reply


– Fix the Wikipedia entries in Wikidata Alpha200807 (talk) 10:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • At first glance it seems like Hyundai should redirect to Hyundai Motor Company, although I am sure there are past discussions on this topic; I don't see any reason why Hyundai Group would be considered the primary topic in English here, so I would also be likely to oppose the second part of the move of Hyundai Group to the shorter title. Anything to do with Wikidata is not a great reason to rearrange pages on the English Wikipedia. Dekimasuよ! 13:43, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose (strongly). Hyundai Motor Company is also EXTREMELY notable, and is an equally strong contender for the basename of "Hyundai". So, leave the disambiguation page where it is.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paintspot (talkcontribs) 14:39, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per above. Hyundai Motor Company is primary, if anything; but the status quo works best. 162 etc. (talk) 16:19, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose - no move rationale given by nominator. No evidence provided that Hyundai Group is the primary topic for the dab page, and it looks to me that it is not. --Sable232 (talk) 20:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • I wonder if there's any appetite for a broad-concept article here... -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 22:06, 24 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose Hyundai Motor Company has 50,453 views compared with only 21,502[[1]] for Hyundai Motor Group. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose per all above. If anything, Hyundai Motor Company is primary. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:03, 26 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 13 October 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: SNOW CLOSE - All oppose, nom has been blocked indefinitely for WP:CIR (non-admin closure) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 21:15, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


HyundaiHyundai (disambiguation) – after previous move request from 23 September was rejected, Hyundai should redirect to Hyundai Group or Hyundai Motor Company Alpha200807 (talk) 09:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose The Motor Company does not get enough additional views compared to the Group to be considered a primary topic. This is a clear WP:NOPRIMARY situation as I am sure many English-speakers mainly know Hyundai from its cars and are mostly looking for Hyundai Motors, which also goes by "Hyundai". Anyway, if the initial move of the group got soundly rejected, there is no point for this to go ahead. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 12:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. No primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 15:11, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oppose - WP:NOPRIMARY.Considering this was recently discussed, resulting in what looks to be a consensus that there is in fact no primary topic, I would also suggest a WP:SNOWCLOSE. estar8806 (talk) 22:03, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
after Hyundai moved to Hyundai (disambiguation), Hyundai should list at RfD Alpha200807 (talk) 05:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.