Talk:Hurricane Danny (1985)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merge?
editUhh, why does this storm have an article? It didn't do that much and there isn't a terrible amount of information here (reminds me of Cindy of '05; which shouldn't have an article either, but we won't go there). -- §HurricaneERIC§Damagesarchive 02:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- The only reason why I didn't merge it right away (after seeing your notice) was due to the damage total. If more specifics can be found regarding what the storm did, especially if anything notable, then this article could stay. It is very iffy currently, and without a lot of work it will probably be merged. Hurricanehink 04:51, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, I think this should stay, mainly due to the tornado outbreak. 39 tornadoes spawned by the storm is pretty notable to me, as that also appears on the List of notable Atlantic hurricanes. The content is barely passable, and still needs more, but it is getting there. Also, I believe the tornado information should be its own section. You should cover the wind and rain damage in one section, followed by a tornado sub-section. Hurricanehink 16:17, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Just let it stay. It made landfall, caused a bunch of damage and killed some people. Works fine as an independent article. Everyking 00:28, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
I see no reason to merge. This is perfectly fine as an independent article. Sarge Baldy 23:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- From a notability standpoint, $200m 2005USD and basically no deaths is a toss-up. From a content standpoint, the article is solid. From a quality standpoint, it needs a lot of work (for instance I'm sure there have been at least 5 hurricanes to make landfall along the gulf coast). — jdorje (talk) 03:46, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- I am assuming this is no longer being proposed to be merged. YE Pacific Hurricane 18:57, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- From a notability standpoint, $200m 2005USD and basically no deaths is a toss-up. From a content standpoint, the article is solid. From a quality standpoint, it needs a lot of work (for instance I'm sure there have been at least 5 hurricanes to make landfall along the gulf coast). — jdorje (talk) 03:46, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Hurricane Danny (1985). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140312225339/http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/orders/IPS-432F1F97-47BD-42FC-9921-2BBB2E3D0DCE.pdf to http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/orders/IPS-432F1F97-47BD-42FC-9921-2BBB2E3D0DCE.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:17, 15 January 2016 (UTC)