Talk:History of the Philadelphia Phillies

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Whiterabbitzero in topic Merge with the Philadelphia Phillies page

Image copyright problem with Image:Phila Jays.PNG edit

The image Image:Phila Jays.PNG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

2009 edit

Where's 2009? JAF1970 (talk) 07:48, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

It hasn't been written yet. KV5 (TalkPhils) 12:40, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed removal of redundant publisher information edit

A number of citations in this article unnecessarily include the publisher for periodicals and websites that have their own Wikipedia article. This information has no value to anyone wanting to check or track down references. For example, publisher=Washington Post Company for references to The Washington Post, or publisher=MLB Advanced Media for references to Baseball-Reference.com, only make the article longer - significantly longer when repeated many times - without adding anything useful. Therefore I plan to upgrade the article's citations to remove all such redundant publisher info, bringing them into line with the recommended use of the cite template (see Template:Citation#Publisher). Please raise any questions here or on my talk page. Colonies Chris (talk) 21:38, 16 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Early naming edit

The new team was nicknamed the "Quakers"... in 1884, the team changed its name to the "Philadelphias"

Um, no and no. The team, like most at the time, had no name at all; "Quakers," "Philadelphias" and its reduction "Phillies" were all monickers used by sportswiters, but never by the team until 1933 Solicitr (talk) 01:12, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of the Philadelphia Phillies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merge with the Philadelphia Phillies page edit

Is there a way to merge the page with the Philadelphia Phillies page by any chance? I see no reason why there are two pages of Phillies history. Both pages have information that the other does not have, so we should combine them instead of keeping them separate.SBLII (talk) 15:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I agree on this. The history page should just remain on the team's main article. No sense in having this page, which does not have much information. Whiterabbitzero (talk) 09:09, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Bill Veeck transaction edit

This article states, "However, in 2006, Jules Tygiel published an article in the 2006 edition of Baseball Research Journal which proved Veeck indeed planned to buy the Phillies." However, the Tygiel article clearly states, at page 114: "The overall assessment of Jordan, et al. - that Veeck's notion of buying the Phillies and fielding a team of Negro League stars never quite moved as far from the drawing board as Veeck claimed - may still be true. We still lack any solid evidence that confirms that Veeck had not only conceptualized this action, but made a firm offer to buy the Phillies and met a rebuff by Landis and Frick." On the same page, Tygiel concedes that though Veeck's story originated years before his memoir was published, "In all of these accounts the only voice telling the story remains Veeck's."Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 02:25, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply