Talk:History of Eastern Christianity

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Marcocapelle in topic Redundant

Neutrality in question

edit

Please post what in the neutrality of the article is in question here so that they might be addressed and or resolved. LoveMonkey (talk) 13:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

This article needs more sources for verification. I know it has been tagged as such, but I'm just giving a friendly reminder. :-)Bless sins (talk) 04:51, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Point out the instances of POV

edit

Making unverifiable accusation is not friendly. Stop skirting the issue and post your specific objections. LoveMonkey (talk) 15:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I never added the POV tag (not even the verification tag). I don't even remember editing the article. But it seems that much of the article is unsourced and needs sources.
"Stop skirting the issue and post your specific objections" you say? If that's your attitude, then I can simply remove the unsourced content (rather than giving you a chance to source it), as the content was marked unsourced since February.Bless sins (talk) 22:48, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your the one that responded above. As for attitude let me say I am grateful you and your buddies haven't put this article up for deletion like the Islam and anti-Christian persecution article. Since even sourcing that article did no good. LoveMonkey (talk) 01:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Redundant

edit

Nearly the entire article is describing the same historical phenomena as History of Christianity, it's not focusing on the east at all. It would only become interesting to describe Eastern Christianity after the split between western and eastern churches, but that's hardly included here. So I would consider this article to be entirely redundant. Marcocapelle (talk) 18:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply