Talk:Hilton Als

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hilton Als. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Replaced archive link http://www.webcitation.org/5hceL1nAH with http://www.webcitation.org/5hceL1nAH?url=http://www.news.cornell.edu/chronicle/04/2.12.04/Als-Nathan_Award.html on http://www.news.cornell.edu/stories/2003/12/hilton-als-new-yorker-reviewer-wins-10000-nathan-award

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Hilton Als bibliography

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

There's no obvious reason to split off the bibliography per WP:CONSPLIT or WP:SIZESPLIT, especially if the bibliography were brought down to a size and level of detail in keeping with WP:INDISCRIMINATE. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 21:24, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Bibliographies#Author_bibliographies Sunwin1960 (talk) 11:43, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

I don't see the relevance. First, WikiProject recommendations don't trump the Wikipedia policies and guidelines cited above. Second, in this case the WikiProject recommendations don't contradict anything I've said: the section suggests some cases where a bibliography article is not appropriate (non-notable authors, authors with fewer than 10 publications) but it doesn't follow that bibliography articles are necessary or useful in all other cases. The rest of the section just describes how to structure a bibliography article, which is separate from the question of whether to have one at all. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 11:50, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

• Support merge (or delete). Als is a regular columnist in a weekly publication. Having a complete bibliography of his articles is pointless. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 23:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.