Talk:Hayashi Narinaga

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 01:30, May 5, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Cleanup edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thank you for this lengthy and interesting article. A few notes:

It is standard to wikilink a term only once in an article, the first time it appears.
It is cleaner, and neater, to relink to the same reference by using <ref name=X> blah blah blah</ref> and then citing <ref name=X/> later. This way, all the reference links point to the same footnote, rather than appearing as separate footnotes with the same name.
Your facts and details are great, but the language needs to be cleaned up considerably. Many phrases are not full sentences and thus do not have meaning. Also, very little context is given for the connection between statements.

Welcome to Wikipedia. I look forward to working with you more in future. LordAmeth (talk) 22:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic