Talk:Hans Nicolussi Caviglia

(Redirected from Talk:Hans Nicolussi)
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Arbitrarily0 in topic Requested move 26 November 2023

Requested move 4 November 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. editors don't support moving to "Nicolussi Caviglia". If there is support for a move to "Hans Nicolussi Caviglia", I recommend a new RM with evidence that it is the WP:COMMONNAME. (non-admin closure) VR talk 13:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


Hans NicolussiNicolussi Caviglia – Sevreral sources call him Nicolussi Caviglia rater than Hans Nicolussi. Dr Salvus 14:33, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 26 November 2023

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:01, 3 December 2023 (UTC)Reply


Hans NicolussiHans Nicolussi Caviglia – Sources generally refer to him with his full last name "Nicolussi Caviglia" rather than just "Nicolussi". Examples: [1] [2] [3] [4]. The same club Juventus lists him as "Hans Nicolussi Caviglia": [5]. Angelo (talk) 14:49, 26 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.