Talk:Habonim Dror Australia

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Malik Shabazz in topic Merge discussion

I don't think my Hebrew spelling was very good on the words I used. If someone comes across this, can you check it? -- Thanks, Liam 08:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I don't think " Due to lack of numbers, the Adelaide branch only has a secretary." is neccessary as this is not always the case.

Perhaps then "At the moment, due to..."? -- Liam 12:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
OK, that sounds better, Liam. -- User:reubenbolaffi --124.177.229.59 11:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

The image Image:Habodror semel.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:52, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge discussion

edit

A merge template was added to this article my Malik Shabbaz, and I agree with the proposed merge into Habonim Dror, which already has a section about the Australian branch. Debresser (talk) 16:36, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks Debresser. I meant to start a Talk page discussion but I got distracted.
I'm not sure Habonim Dror Australia warrants a page of its own. I think it is better dealt with as the other national divisions of HD are, in the main Habonim Dror article. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:06, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

whilst each country's Habonim Dror branch is affiliated through its parent movement, they act as separate organisations essentially within theirt country. therefore Habonim Dror Australia, UK, and any other, definitely warrent their own pages. (Mitch.garver (talk) 17:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC))Reply

But most of the content in this article duplicates Habonim Dror. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply