Talk:HMS Thruster (1917)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Indy beetle in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Thruster (1917)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Indy beetle (talk · contribs) 06:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply


I'll take this one. -Indy beetle (talk) 06:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Comments

edit
  • As the destroyer escorted the prizes back to Harwich, they were attacked by torpedo but suffered no hits. Presumably by a German U-boat?
  • returned to the Flanders coast for what would one of the last patrols of the war. For what would be one of the last patrols? Also was the sailing to Flanders the patrol, or did the patrol occur afterwards?
  • but withdrew before the outbreak of hostilities between Italy and the United Kingdom. Might be good to specify that that wasn't until 1940.
  • Earwig's tool returns no meaningful similarities with other work.

@Indy beetle: Thank you for your comments. I think all the changes have been made. simongraham (talk) 07:09, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Assessment

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: