Talk:HMS Rattlesnake (1910)
Latest comment: 2 months ago by Simongraham in topic GA Review
 | HMS Rattlesnake (1910) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 10, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Rattlesnake (1910)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 20:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:18, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Images appropriately licensed
- Abbreviate nautical miles in the infobox
- Done.
- link long tons, direct drive and shaft horsepower
- Linked.
- What did the boilers feed the turbines?
- Steam. I've added a bit to the sentence that I hope helps clarify this.
- Three digits to the right of the decimal point seems a bit excessive
- I know. It is what the source says.
- Kabatepe. turning the ship's is this supposed to be a comma?
- Fixed.
- Any word on activities in 1916?
- There is nothing in the sources about Rattlesnake explicitly but I have added something generic based on the flotilla's activity.
- at Hampton Roads and via missing comma
- Reworded sentence to make it more clear.
- Hargreaves and Moore not used
- Removed.
@Sturmvogel 66: Thank you. Please take a look at my amends and tell me if there is anything else. simongraham (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2024 (UTC)