 | HMS Canopus (1798) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 30, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that HMS Canopus (pictured) served for less than six months for the French Navy, and then for 89 years for the Royal Navy? | |||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Canopus (1798)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:08, 27 October 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Link to the ranks of Captain, Rear Admiral and Vice Admiral. What's a mooring hulk?
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I'll review this tomorrow.
- Done. I have one further question though. Not sure of the consensus you guys have on this, but would it be good to redirect French ship Franklin (1797) to this, seeing as how it's the same ship? Not sure if the separate articles are justified, especially since this one explains the French career anyway. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:21, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'd merge the other article into this one with a redirect. Especially since she was so briefly in French service.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:54, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:12, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'd merge the other article into this one with a redirect. Especially since she was so briefly in French service.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:54, 27 October 2010 (UTC)