Talk:Guy Môquet

Untitled

Hi, I have translated the French article for inclusion here. I will integrate it with what is already up - but most of the content is actually already from the French Wikipedia article. Some of the English in this article is awkward, though; I will replace this. I will also integrate the sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.207.165.116 (talk • contribs)

The last sentence of "Family background" is impossible to understandable. One cannot tell whether it refers to Guy, Prosper or Henri. Rama 09:49, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

The "Humanité" translation omits the final sentence: "Last thoughts: to you all that are remaining, be worthy of us, the 27 who will die." 86.139.189.133 19:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi all, Indeed French English ("franglais") is awkward, but we could have a special page in Wikipedia explaining this. For example, in Franglais, "a militant" would mean an activist in normal English; "actually" would mean presently; "to understandable" simply means to understand; "one cannot tell" means it is unclear; etc. Shall we do that? shall we create a page for Le Franglais? Amicalement, LOL Johannjs 23:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

In French, the article is not part of a word, and names of languages are not capitalised. Your "Le Franglais" is ridiculous on several accounts. Rama 00:14, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

LOL, I was sure enough we were here on a page in English!? in what I wrote, only words "entre guillemets" are in French. And also, of course, my ending Amicalement. Johannjs 01:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Of course. And in two words in French, you made two mistakes. I though it amical to let you know, since you are so helpful about others' command of English. Rama 06:22, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

--- It may be helpful to note the following facts in this article: that French Communist propagandizing was illegalised by the pre-defeat Republican govt and that prior to 1941 the official position of the French Communist party was one of non-resistance to the German occupier (both a product of the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact).99.240.135.225 (talk) 00:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello, as said by 99.240.135.225, there is a missunderstood around Guy Môquet, explained here with references and facts by the French Philosopher Michel Onfray: http://mo.michelonfray.fr/chroniques/la-chronique-mensuelle-de-michel-onfray-n%25C2%25B0-78-novembre-2011/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.18.80.219 (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2012 (UTC)