Talk:Guru Randhawa
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
File nominated for deletion on commons edit
file:c:File:Guru Randhawa.jpg Reason:No permission indicated subpage:
Message automatically deposited by a robot on 09:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harideepan (talk • contribs)
April 2018 edit
@Cyphoidbomb: - Is this link any good? The website(genius.com) seems to have an article on Wikipedia, but the content in that link looks like it has been copied from an old version of this wiki article. Kindly look into the matter - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Fylindfotberserk: I wouldn't use it. No presumption of fact-checking, and Genius.com is, generally speaking, largely contains user-generated content, so there's no reason to think that there's an exception for biographies. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:36, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
April 2019 edit
@Cyphoidbomb: Sir, is this source reliable. The about section and the trending sections are making me think it to be an aggregator site. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Fylindfotberserk: I've never heard of it, but they publish a magazine which suggests some sort of editorial oversight and journalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:05, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Cyphoidbomb: Yeah the magazine. But in RSN, people are questioning Femina as well here. Not to mention, IB Times, Forbes, MSNBC, CNN, Fox News are also questionable according to them. I've also posted regarding Darpan Magazine in WP:RSN. Anyway, I've found an IndianExpress source which supports his birth name as well his birth place. Should I remove the Darpan source or keep it? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:08, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Fylindfotberserk: You'll have to use your best judgment. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Cyphoidbomb: It'll be redundant but I believe there wouldn't be any harm if we keep it. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:16, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Fylindfotberserk: You'll have to use your best judgment. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:11, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Cyphoidbomb: Yeah the magazine. But in RSN, people are questioning Femina as well here. Not to mention, IB Times, Forbes, MSNBC, CNN, Fox News are also questionable according to them. I've also posted regarding Darpan Magazine in WP:RSN. Anyway, I've found an IndianExpress source which supports his birth name as well his birth place. Should I remove the Darpan source or keep it? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:08, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Why The Chart Positions on UK ASIAN CHARTS WERE REMOVED ? edit
Hey Yellow Alligator, I mentioned Chart Positions for few songs of Guru Randhawa. All the info was taken from website of OFFICIAL UK ASIAN CHARTS WEBSITE, STILL THEY WERE DELETED, WHY????? ALL PROPER REFERENCES WERE MENTIONED TOO IndieOKB (talk) 21:33, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
@Yellowalligator
IndieOKB (talk) 21:34, 30 May 2021 (UTC)