Talk:Great Seto Bridge

Latest comment: 10 months ago by Jono from oz in topic "Scientists" more likely engineers

The name of the bridge edit

Is this bridge really referred to as the Seto-Ohashi Bridge in English? Doesn't the 大橋 (Ō-hashi) part of 瀬戸大橋 (Seto Ō-hashi) already mean bridge? Hence I would've thought referring to it as the Seto-Ohashi Bridge would be like saying Mt Fujiyama or ATM machine. Stephen Mok 18:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

You're right, it is like saying "ATM Machine" ("Mt Fujiyama" is even weirder, since it's "Fujisan" in Japanese). Not sure whether anyone calls it that or not, but if they do, it's reasonable for the article to make reference to it. The article does use "Great Seto Bridge" as the primary name. adamrice 19:05, 23 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
I was about to make the same comment but since you've already mentioned it I'll go back to sipping my chai tea latte with milk. If nobody can find a ref for this misnomer, let's remove it. JIMp talk·cont 04:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Here a ref for it
JIMp talk·cont 04:41, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Improvements edit

This is really a beautiful bridge. The views are beautiful when the fog and clouds do not close in. The "Trivia" section should be renamed "Bridge Stats" or something similar. Or maybe moved into a info box. See: Akashi-Kaikyō Bridge The use of a map would be very helpful. By comparing how other bridge articles are done, this article can be improved. This can be a great article. Good start! Please continue to work on it. Enfermero (talk) 20:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merge edit

These six named bridges have their own stubby little articles. Each of these articles is a copy-and-paste of each other with the details changed. Why do we need this? Let's just merge them all here. JIMp talk·cont 05:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Support. That sounds sensible to me. I can't see much scope for expanding any of the individual bridge articles. --DAJF (talk) 05:13, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. Sounds reasonable. They're all parts of one bridge system, and the final article would have a better chance of reaching B-class than all the separate stubs. Boneyard90 (talk) 17:59, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Done. JIMp talk·cont 00:12, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Seto Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Scientists" more likely engineers edit

Scientists began investigations shortly after

They were more likely to have been engineers: civil, structural and geotechnical engineers. Jono from oz (talk) 08:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply