Talk:Gotcha Force

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

npov violation? edit

I'm not sure if this qualifies as a npov violation, but is the statement "but almost all of the gamers who played the game consider it one of the greatest GameCube titles in existence" verifiable? I would be curious to see if there was a consensus on that...CharacterZero 22:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Check out fan-submitted reviews on GameSpot, GameFAQs, and the like. TerminusEst13

but that still makes use of weasle words, might someone refrence the reviews and such? I would, but I am a tad busy at the moment Moon Stone 03:46, 5 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, I got around to it, and cited sorces for the good user reviews, and cleaned the talk page a tad as well ^_^ Moon Stone 21:58, 5 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

rumors? edit

Looking the page over, I noticed " Rumors of a Gotcha Force 2 abound.". Are there really rumors? and if they are, are they caused by eager fans, or is it a little bit more based on facts. Cause if not, it really should be deleted. Moon Stone 22:25, 5 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Rumors are exactly that, rumors. Many rumors are based on hearsay, rather than actual facts--Capcom, however, does not seem to be forgetting about this game--their site has celebrated two years' worth of anniversaries, toys have been developed, plenty of screenshots of the developers messing around. Thus, fans take this as a hope that Capcom wants to develop a sequel. Logically, however, the chances of a sequel are very, very slim--hence, mere rumors, with very little factual evidence to back them up. Nature's cruel, eh? If one still thinks it should be deleted, however, feel free to smack it down, I've certainly got nothing against it. And yes, there are really rumors. -- TerminusEst13

"Capcom, however, does not seem to be forgetting about this game" You sure about that? Last time I checked, it wasn't even mentioned on Capcom's site... --The last sheikah 14:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Quite sadly, a lot of crap isn't mentioned on the retail American site. For example, the only Resident Evil on there is 4, despite how much Capcom milks the franchise. I'm more referring to the official GF japanese site. -- TerminusEst13

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gotcha Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gotcha Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gotcha Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Reply