Talk:Ghost in the Machine (song)
Latest comment: 19 hours ago by Kimikel in topic Did you know nomination
This article is a current featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to meet the criteria. Please feel free to After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{Article history}} template when the FAC closes. |
Ghost in the Machine (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 13, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ghost in the Machine (song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit
( )
- ... that one critic interpreted a SZA song as being about her fears about the growing influence of AI in the music industry?
- Source: American Songwriter: " For most of the track, SZA smoothly croons about the disheartening taste in the music industry. As she notices the growing influence of artificial intelligence on the pop landscape, evident in the Robot got future, I don't lyric, she looks to her lover to distract her from her worrisome reality."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/WRLH (New Hampshire)
- Comment: Open to hook suggestions.
Improved to Good Article status by PSA (talk) and Dylan620 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 21 past nominations.
PSA 🏕️🪐 (please make some noise...) 01:35, 20 June 2024 (UTC).
- @PSA and Dylan620: Please provide a QPQ. Z1720 (talk) 15:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Z1720: D'oh! Apologies for the oversight and thank you for catching that – I've added an older review of mine as a QPQ. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 16:31, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Approving nomination. Article is long enough and passed GA review 7 days prior to DYK nomination. Article is presentable, well-sourced, and copy-vio free. The hook is interesting and sourced well. QPQ is done. Nothing else to comment on from me. Thank you for the submission PSA and Dylan620! Kimikel (talk) 03:48, 30 June 2024 (UTC)