Talk:German destroyer Z14 Friedrich Ihn
Latest comment: 9 years ago by ÄDA - DÄP in topic Comments
 | German destroyer Z14 Friedrich Ihn has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 9, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Comments edit
- Lede
- "the ship made multiple successful minelaying sorties off the English coast that claimed 18 merchant ships and a destroyer" - Those were due to the mines rather than the sorties, I persume.
- "was transferred to France" relocated, rather than handed over, I guess
- Construction and career
- "The ship participated in the August 1938 Fleet Review as part of the 3rd Destroyer Division." - Links to the Commonwealth one, but refers to the 22 August 1938 review in Kiel, I would say.
- "escorting Adolf Hitler aboard the pocket battleship Deutschland to occupy Memel." - Did Hitler occupy Memel on his own?
- "Under the command of Commodore Friedrich Bonte[11] in his flagship Hermann Künne" - Should link to Kommodore.
- Fate
- According to this article, she was handed over to the Soviets on 15 December 1945 and left for Libau on 5 February 1946, where she served as Zorkyj until she was scrapped in 1961. But I will check on this.
ÄDA - DÄP VA (talk) 05:12, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- While I appreciate your close reading, these comments have nothing to do with a B-class assessment and are far more appropriate for a GAN. Nonetheless, I've addressed these issues so see how they read.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- It seemed a bit harsh to me, too, but there were just too many oversights adding up, which resulted in "obvious [...] inaccuracies]], as it says in the B2 criteria. If I hadn't read up on Z14 beforehand, I might have been more forgiving. B-class now. ÄDA - DÄP VA (talk) 04:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- But what was actually inaccurate? Some of the links needed to be fixed and some language clarified, but there wasn't anything factually incorrect, IMO. Your language seemed a bit extreme to me.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:19, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- I might have overdone it a bit at the time, but digging deeper I found some more inaccuracies, e.g. the displacement was a mix-up of the Deschimag and Germania batch. The bigger question is how much "not just right" differs from "not quite wrong"? ÄDA - DÄP VA (talk) 08:27, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- But what was actually inaccurate? Some of the links needed to be fixed and some language clarified, but there wasn't anything factually incorrect, IMO. Your language seemed a bit extreme to me.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:19, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- It seemed a bit harsh to me, too, but there were just too many oversights adding up, which resulted in "obvious [...] inaccuracies]], as it says in the B2 criteria. If I hadn't read up on Z14 beforehand, I might have been more forgiving. B-class now. ÄDA - DÄP VA (talk) 04:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- While I appreciate your close reading, these comments have nothing to do with a B-class assessment and are far more appropriate for a GAN. Nonetheless, I've addressed these issues so see how they read.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC)