Talk:Georgia Aquarium

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Nanotyrannus in topic Animal Collections
Former good article nomineeGeorgia Aquarium was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 30, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
September 20, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 May 2020 and 23 July 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Allustrated B. Peer reviewers: K.stubbs40893.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Location

edit

Is all the stuff about location really necessary? How is any of that stuff relevent to the topic? The location of the acquarium has been metioned earlier in the article, why are we trying to plug the prime real estate of that area in this article? How does it matter where CNN, Philips Arena and Ernst & Young are located? AreJay

Agreed — There is a lot of stuff in that area (it is downtown Atlanta, so of course it's near a lot of things). The aquarium is also very near the Georgia State campus, and in decent walking distance from Georgia Tech. ~ Booya Bazooka 22:33, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

The article is factually incorrect in regards to Pemberton Place. The W Hotel, Ernst & Young, and Southern Company are all part of a development named Ivan Allen Plaza. It is close to the aquarium but is not the same thing as Pemberton Place, which consists of the Georgia Aquarium, the new World of Coca-Cola museum and greenspace to be developed later. Pemberton Place is one superblock bounded by Centennial Olympic Park Drive, Baker Street, Luckie Street, and Ivan Allen Jr. Blvd. Once an article (or at least a stub) is created for Pemberton Place, this confusion should be decreased.

The location is relevent in sense that the aquarium has spurred or at the very least, accelerated development in a part of Atlanta that was mostly made up of vacant lots and industrial buildings. The brand of hotel or name of which corporate headquarters are located nearby does not appear to be relevent. AubieTurtle 18:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Failed GA

edit

A very nice article, but it needs footnotes. "General references" doesn't cut it when you've got so many specific facts.

Other than that, well-written and (especially) illustrated. Daniel Case 01:55, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Exhibits

edit

The exhibits should be listed in the order they are explained.68.225.113.222 19:54, 8 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Largest

edit

The article casts a lot of doubt on the largest claim, but it doesn't actually note any competing aquariums that say they're larger. Note that the Dubai project is not yet open for business, so it doesn't count. If there are no active competing claims, this should just be stated as a fact. Superm401 - Talk 07:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree, I came here looking for "the world's largest aquarium". I kept searching after reading this article because it is so wishy-washy. Yet, no other (completed) aquarium seems to compete. Why the ambiguity? 76.176.221.236 (talk) 06:23, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

It has been over two years since this discussion thread was started and nobody has come forward with any references to larger aquariums. I'm going to go out on a limb and take away the ambiguity.74.228.64.159 (talk) 19:25, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

It is no longer the largest. The S.E.A. Aquarium, Singapore, with its 49 habitats totalling 38.7 million litres (8.5 million UK gal; 10.2 million US gal) of salt water and fresh water, is the world's largest aquarium. It was officially inaugurated on 7 December 2012.12.132.34.34 (talk) 21:53, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

I presume you have a source for this change? --McDoobAU93 22:13, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

In the section entitled Gallery, there is a box saying,"This section looks like an image gallery" as if it is a bad thing. This section is actually entitled Gallery, so it's idiotic to tell us it looks like an image gallery. Perhaps this tag should be removed.--STAR TREK enthusiast Open channel 19:37, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia policy regarding image galleries does suggest that the number of pictures here may be excessive. We should look at the photos and determine those photos that best describe the aquarium itself. The article is about the aquarium, not the animals inside it. I count about 10 of the 16 photos that could be removed, personally. Opinions? --McDoobAU93 (talk) 14:15, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
I think the pictures give the reader a fuller picture of what the aquarium has to offer. Moving them to some other location would be negative impact on user experience, favoring some arbitrary rule that does not seem to make sense in this situation, imho. Dejavidor (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Including Chicago's Shedd Aquarium"

edit

I really don't think it is necessary to put a specific location of a Beluga whale sanctuary other than the one the article is about. This should be removed. Belugaboy535136 talk 12:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Way, way, way, way overdetailed

edit

There's far too much detail about individual animals, their names, date they arrived, which tank they occupied temporarily while their regular tank was being redecorated, that two of them had formerly lived under a roller coaster in Mexico, the color of the wetsuits worn by guests when the Star Spangled Banner was played on air horns by deaf-blind oceangoing cheetahs, what the first necropsy showed, what the revised necropsy showed, what the necropsy would have concluded had the facts been different from what they actually were, et cetera, et certera, and so on and so forth. "Chef Wolfgang Puck's company manages catering services. The aquarium also includes a fairly large food court with tables extending into the main lobby." Really? Oh do go on! Are there free refills on the supersize sodas? EEng (talk) 17:36, 23 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Georgia Aquarium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:30, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Georgia Aquarium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Georgia Aquarium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Georgia Aquarium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Georgia Aquarium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Animal Collections

edit

I recently visited the aquarium, and can confirm from personal account that both “Raven” the manta ray and “Trixie” the whale shark are deceased as of 2021. They each passed in 2020, and I know of at least one press release referring to Trixie’s passing. The article ought to be updated to reflect such a major change in collections. Nanotyrannus (talk) 20:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

As of February 2022, “Alice” the whale shark has also passed. They also added another manta, “Blue”, at some point in the last decade that this article does not reference. Nanotyrannus (talk) 03:15, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply