Talk:Fundamental laws of the Kingdom of France

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Mathglot in topic Finding sources

Finding sources

edit

Try these links to help find reliable sources which could be used to cite this article:

(in English): Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
(in French): Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 03:14, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copoied links into the header above. Mathglot (talk) 01:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

*[2] -- used this one Elinruby (talk) 04:11, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

*[6] used this narrarive bibliography for early writers Elinruby (talk) 05:03, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ran WP:ReFill against the list, and it filled out most of them. Mathglot (talk) 03:17, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

qwant group

edit

A few more, from Qwant:

  • like Cliff notes for Frenchies; contains a definition[11]
  • serious essay[12]
  • chatty, q+a format[13]
  • syllabus at U. of Rennes for course with the article title as the course name[14]
  • from the PoV of legal status of the crown and the kingdom[15]

Ran WP:ReFill against it. Mathglot (talk) 03:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Five more from Qwant:

  • royalist website; includes definition, discusses difference between the crown, and its bearer[16]
  • from the legal PoV; has download link for 37-page pdf[17]
  • dissertation, from dissertation repository[18]
  • chap. II is on the title topic; from a book on the Ancien Regime by Y. Bercé (fee)[19]
  • article on 17th c. absolutism and monarchy[20]

(Wait for reFill...) Mathglot (talk) 03:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Expanded by reFill, except for the fee-based one. Mathglot (talk) 03:53, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Done Okay, I'm done here for now. At least it looks very real, and the topic is clearly notable, so that's good news. Mathglot (talk) 03:54, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Here's another one: Radica-2009 (see Further reading for citation) on Trois interprétations de la notion de « lois fondamentales » au xviiie siècle, with full text of the book available. Mathglot (talk) 06:58, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
References

References

  1. ^ https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6982&context=mlr
  2. ^ https://mjp.univ-perp.fr/france/co1789.htm
  3. ^ Nelson, Eric W. (November 1, 2000). "Defining the Fundamental Laws of France: The Proposed First Article of the Third Estate at the French Estates General of 1614". English Historical Review. 115 (464): 1216. doi:10.1093/enghis/115.464.1216 – via EBSCOhost.
  4. ^ Maral, Alexandre (July 1, 2015). "Saint-Simon et la mort de Louis XIV". Cahiers Saint-Simon. 43 (1): 1–9. doi:10.3406/simon.2015.1734 – via www.persee.fr.
  5. ^ Potin, Yann (July 1, 2000). "L'État et son trésor". Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales. 133 (1): 48–52. doi:10.3406/arss.2000.2678 – via www.persee.fr.
  6. ^ Aubert, Félix (July 1, 1908). "Les lois fondamentales de la monarchie française d'après les théories de l'ancien régime, par André Lemaire". Bibliothèque de l'École des chartes. 69 (1): 663–667 – via www.persee.fr.
  7. ^ https://www.cairn.info/l-ancien-regime--9782715400993.htm
  8. ^ "L'Intérêt général de l'état, ou la Liberté du commerce des blés, démontrée conforme au droit naturel; au droit public de la France; aux loix fondamentales du royaume; à l'intérêt commun du souverain & de ses sujets dans tous les temps: avec la réputation d'un nouveau systême [by F. Galiani], publié en forme de Dialogues, sur le commerce des blés. [By P. P. F. J. H. Le Mercier de la Rivière.]". July 1, 1770 – via Google Books.
  9. ^ Herzogin), Marie Christine (Sachsen-Teschen (July 1, 1792). "Lieutnans, Gouverneurs & Capitaines-Généraux des Pays-Bas, &c., Les Factieux, qui depuis quatre ans dechirent le Royaume de France, viennent de porter le Roi tres-Chretien a fanctionner une declaration de guerre contre Sa Majeste Apostoolique notre tres-honore Seigneur & Neveu ..." d'Emm – via Google Books.
  10. ^ https://www.cairn.info/une-histoire-de-l-etat-en-europe--9782724611038.htm
  11. ^ "Lois fondamentales du royaume : tout comprendre | Jurixio". November 10, 2022.
  12. ^ Galliae, Vexilla (September 6, 2017). "Essai sur les Lois fondamentales du royaume de France".
  13. ^ le, Par Cyricsun (July 2, 2023). "Les lois fondamentales du Royaume de France". Omnilogie.
  14. ^ "Les lois fondamentales du Royaume de France - Vive le Roy". www.viveleroy.fr.
  15. ^ "Les lois fondamentales du Royaume : statut et transmission de la Couronne – Fiches / Cours". April 29, 2020.
  16. ^ "La constitution de la France monarchique". April 18, 2020.
  17. ^ "Les Lois Fondamentales du Royaume de France".
  18. ^ "Les lois fondamentales du royaume de France - Dissertation - jeremy96". www.ladissertation.com.
  19. ^ https://www.cairn.info/l-ancien-regime--9782715400993-page-16.htm
  20. ^ "XVIIe siècle - Absolutisme et monarchie en France - Herodote.net". www.herodote.net.

fundamental lsws of the republic

edit

Came across rhis while clicking around recently. Both you and I worked on ot so it's probably at least half right, but it was a while ago so we should probably check it. Makes sense that there would still be fundamental laws even after it wasn't a monarcht, though, right? It's more surprising that there were some before the revolution. Anyway, consider this a note to us both.Elinruby (talk) 22:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Elinruby, Came across what? Did you forget to add a link? Mathglot (talk) 08:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Mathglot: Fundamental principles recognized by the laws of the Republic Elinruby (talk) 18:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Elinruby: completely different topics. The topic of that article concerns which written laws and documents of France should be considered "of constitutional force" (valeur constitutionnelle) in the present day, and is essentially a debate about the content of the constitutional block. They are all written documents. This article is about unwritten, customary laws from the Middle Ages, about inheritance and legitimacy of the French crown. There are still some traces of unwritten, customary law that have an effect on modern jurisprudence, but they have nothing to do with the constitutional block. So although they are two completely separate topics, the superficial similarity of the titles might imply that hatnotes should be added to both, once this draft is moved to main space to avoid possible confusion, so that was a really good catch to identify them. Mathglot (talk) 18:48, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Added hatnote to the draft. Mathglot (talk) 18:31, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply