Talk:Frieze Art Fair

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 19h00s in topic Editing "Fairs" section

Comments

edit

This article is bad--outset should be its own entry, and the 2006 entry needs updating. some history on the financing and relationship to frieze magazine, which also needs its own entry, ought to happen. 69.86.89.166 03:09, 30 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I concur! Mindman1 04:59, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Well, get searching on google or wherever, add the info and provide the references! I've created Outset Contemporary Art Fund. Tyrenius (talk) 05:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

21:14, 4 June 2011 Artandlife(talk | contribs) (7,999 bytes) (Undid revision 432571437 by Luckykunst (talk)) (undo) Restored relevant, referenced, and factual information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artandlife (talkcontribs) 21:17, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Preparing for Frieze Art Fair, Regents Park (6) - geograph.org.uk - 1524041.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Preparing for Frieze Art Fair, Regents Park (6) - geograph.org.uk - 1524041.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Preparing for Frieze Art Fair, Regents Park (6) - geograph.org.uk - 1524041.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:07, 5 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frieze Art Fair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frieze Art Fair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frieze Art Fair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:37, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Updating the Article

edit

I would like to update the article as follows to include details of the 2021 London fairs. For some reason, 2 editors have reverted my sourced updates on the grounds that they are promotional. I know the article isn't great, but I can't understand why it is wrong or "promotional" to add details of last year's fairs. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Frieze_Art_Fair&type=revision&diff=1067521908&oldid=1067521202 ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ Talk 23:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I think the whole "facts" section should be removed not added to, it is list cruft, trivia and is entirely inappropriate with it's content "Space hire was £180 per meter." etc etc. Theroadislong (talk) 08:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Theroadislong can you please explain why you want to delete this content, and why you deleted my edits clearly, and if possible with reference to wikipedia policies. I don't understand why you think the cost of the fair sourced to a reliable source is trivia or inappropriate, nor do I understand why you think it wrong to list all the fairs. Since you deleted my edit with a different reason I am even more puzzled. ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ Talk 12:23, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
L'Origine du monde, I agree with Theroadislong, all or almost all of the Facts section consists of unencyclopaedic trivia, much of it poorly sourced or without any sourcing at all, and much of it exemplifying what Wikipedia is not (the cost of a stand being a perfect example). I've tagged the page with {{Cleanup rewrite}}, as it seems to need to be fundamentally rewritten to make it encyclopaedic. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:51, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
User:Justlettersandnumbers I have renamed the "facts" section "Fairs" as it is a list of fairs. Please can you explain how the cost of renting a stand at an artfair, or the number of exhibitors, as repeatedly discussed in newspapers and other reliable sources is trivia, not to mention the dates of the fairs. You deleted my edit, which was sourced - was that because you do not think the art newspaper a reliable source? ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ Talk 13:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
The "Fairs" section could be reduced to a couple of paragraphs of sourced content rather than a gargantuan list of largely unsourced trivia. Theroadislong (talk) 13:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
User:Justlettersandnumbers Which exact parts of what Wikipedia is not are you referring to? Please can you explain exactly why you consider the cost or number of exhibitors triva - perhaps give some examples of important information. Do you think it wrong for the article to list all the fairs. I repeat my question about the source I used.♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ Talk 13:04, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
This part I assume WP:INDISCRIMINATE? Theroadislong (talk) 13:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Theroadislong could you please try to explain yourself better. The only relevant information there seems to be about presenting statistics, but you seem to be arguing against the inclusion of any statistics.♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ Talk 13:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
"Excessive listings of unexplained statistics." is the part I was looking at. Theroadislong (talk) 13:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Theroadislong and what relevant information did you see there? How do you think the statistics should be explained or presented? To me it seems sensible to present them by fair, but this is going away from your unexplained refusal to let me add the dates, exhibitor numbers, and stall rental cost statistics. I think it would be good to add visitor numbers and admission cost to the statistics listed, and possibly figures for the value of art exhibited- I have seen such for 2011. ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ Talk 13:48, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I think it is beyond the remit of an encyclopedia article to add statistics like exhibitor numbers, dates and admission costs etc. for each fair. unsigned comment by Theroadislong
Theroadislong could you please explain why, and what exactly you think should be in the article. Surely simple facts have a place in an article!♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ Talk 14:11, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
As advised on my talk page. Do what ever you like, I will remove Frieze Art Fair from my watch list it is in dire need of hacking back but I am not willing to deal with your bludgeoning attitude. Theroadislong (talk) 14:13, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Theroadislong. I have added the sourced details of the last two fairs again. User:Justlettersandnumbers if you object to that edit please can you explain why in detail. ♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ Talk 14:35, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
I have added this text to the lede. I hope it is an improvement.
"The London edition normally has about 160 exhibitors in Frieze. It is held over four days in a 40,000SqM tent. There is a simultaneous Frieze Masters event showing older work with about 130 exhibitors, and a temporary sculpture park." 

♥ L'Origine du monde ♥ Talk 15:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Editing "Fairs" section

edit

Just dropping in a rough visual draft of a new structure for the "Fairs" section before I implement it. If anyone has feedback, feel free to add feedback.

Fairs
--Frieze Art Fair (Frieze London)--
Basic history, usual venue(s), notable features
---List of fairs---
Expandable table/list, with Year, # galleries, Notes/Notable facts
--Frieze Masters--
Basic history, usual venue(s), notable features
---List of fairs---
Expandable table/list, with Year, # galleries, Notes/Notable facts
^repeat structure for Frieze NY, LA, and Seoul 19h00s (talk) 15:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply